# paraphrase this text

Discussion:  1. Table of result: For this inequitable illustration, there was no hypothetical and illustrational appreciates to be paralleld. However, the clump was required to experience the protraction of the blunder vector from the graph, then parallel it to 5% of the last constrainedness fix in the sketch.  - The last constrainedness = -1.10 N - The protraction of the blunder vector = 0.115N Since the protraction of the blunder vector is superior than 5% of the last constrainedness, the illustration failed. 2. Physics of illustration:  In this illustration, to justify the components of a vector, and how vectors are added; a Pasco Mechanics plan was used. Using the avoid law of Newton’s, which says that the constrainedness is the multifariousness of the lump of an end and the succor acting upon it. Three sketchs were effected in this illustration, and in each sketch, vectors were represented by connecting strings in portion of three, to a foe in the average then to a braggadocio. The end of each string was dispread about a hanger, so weighs could be added to the string. The heap of each vector in the three sketchs was appraised by sagacious the constrainedness acting on the strings due to the weighs. Masses were in grams, so they had to be converted to kilograms to consider constrainedness in Newtons. Having the corresponding weighs at the end of each string, and by emotional the lamina of prepossessions; the static equilibrium was symmetrical. When the static equilibrium was met, lumpes of the weighs and constrainednesss were appraised.  3. Sources of blunder: A planatic native blunder occurred consequently of attrition betwixt bullies and strings, or attrition betwixt strings and the consultation of the plan. There were a alien of haphazard blunder in extent. First, capability enjoy happened if the lections of the prepossessions were not exact, which happens if the string doesn’t wholly direction up after a while a infallible prepossession. So, for pattern, the prepossession would be betwixt any two opposed appreciates, which makes it constrained to state what would be the lection of that prepossession. Second, happens if the percent blunder of the blunder vector is superior than 5%.  4. Results:  For this inequitable illustration, there was no hypothetical and illustrational appreciates to be paralleld. However, the clump was required to experience the protraction of the blunder vector from the graph, then parallel it to 5% of the last constrainedness fix in the sketch. The illustration in this sketch fails consequently the protraction of the blunder vector is superior than 5% of last constrainedness.  Conclusion: The deep end of performing this illustration was to appraise vectors by adding. The three constrainednesss acting on the Pasco Mechanics plan were appraised using Newton’s law of moment, which created a static equilibrium. after, the blunder vector was appraised and paralleld to appreciate of 5% of the last constrainedness in the plan. The illustration has failed; consequently the protraction of the blunder vector crusty out to be superior than 5% of the last constrainedness in the plan.