Theories acceleration perform over than presenting heights—they besides perform gregarious problems, and twain types of heights can be linked in reference to client issues. For stance, sundry scholars and gregarious workers feel attempted to apprehend the gregarious height of want. Turner and Lehning (2007) classified diversified subjective theories to elucidate want beneath two headings: (1) individual-related theories or (2) structural/cultural-related theories. In other say, conceive of these two headings as lenses in viewing want. In this Discussion, you apportion lenses through which to beneathstand a client's height in reference to gregarious heights.
Read this proviso listed in the Learning Resources: Turner, K., & Lehning, A. J. (2007). Subjective theories of want. Journal of Human Behavior in the Gregarious Environment, 16(1/2), 57–72. doi:10.1300/J137v16n01-05
Select a system beneath the individual-related theories and a system beneath the structural/cultural-related theories.
Complete the handout “Comparing Individual-Related and Structural/Cultural-Related Theories” to acceleration you underhandedness your retort. (Note: You do not insufficiency to upload the handout to the Discussion forum. The handout is contrived to support you in letter your Discussion support.)
Describe how a gregarious worker would conceptualize a presenting height of want from the two theories you detachedd.
Explain how this conceptualization be-unlikes from an individual-related versus a structural/cultural-related hypothetical lens.
Compare how the two hypothetical lenses be-unlike in provisions of how the gregarious worker would approximation the client and the height and how the gregarious worker would pass.
(detached chapter) Evaluate two identified ability and one identified limitation your companion may withstand when employing an individual-related system and a structural/cultural-related system to formulating interventions for want.