Around nine in the morning on April 24, 2013, Rana Plaza, an 8-story structure in Savar, Bangladesh, closed catastrophically in a address of twisted indurated, steel, and sewing machinery. At the age, further than three thousand garment workers were on calling in five disconnected factories, located on the structure’s third to eighth floors. 1,134 workers, most of them immature women, were killed, and further than 2,500 others were injured, manifold seriously. It was the conquer industrial embarrassment in the truth of the garment assiduity. Several dozen U.S. and European retailers and brands—including Walmart, Benetton, H&M, the Gap, Inditex, and Loblaw—were at the age or had of-late sourced products from one of the Rana Plaza garment factories. In the suscitate of the mitigation, these companies and others that had spare product to suppliers in the low-wage, fast-growing, and notoriously perilous Bangladeshi garment assiduity faced an grave challenge: What should they do now, succeeding Rana Plaza? This circumstance enables students to explore the causes of and calling for the mitigation of Rana Plaza and to evaluate diverse courses of enjoyment for Western habit companies doing affair in Bangladesh.
Who was legal for the mitigation of Rana Plaza, and why do you apprehend so? In your defense, fascinate address the calling, if any, of the structure proprietor, factory proprietors, Bangladeshi legislation, U.S. and European legislations, Bangladeshi workers and their advocates, dress customers, and habit retailers and brands in the United States, Canada, and Europe.
What could be fascinated now to reduce the chances of a correspondent affliction occurring in the advenient? In your defense, fascinate cogitate what actions, if any, the diverse living-souls and groups mentioned in Question 1 could select.
Of the diverse options you mentioned in reply to Question 2, which do you apprehend is most slight to be effectual, and why?