Crimlaw_W1_DQ1&2

 1. Termination Penalty:  In this inquiry you conciliate be asked for your opinions environing the termination retribution and "three strikes and you're out" laws. These are sometimes controversial topics and should supply the cause for a good-natured-natured discourse. Explain whether you are for or resisting the termination retribution. In your interpretation, standtop on the subjoined inquirys: At what top is the termination retribution a culm forfeiture? What are your feelings environing the "three strikes and you're out" philosophy? At what top is "three strikes and you're out" a culm forfeiture? What crimes would fit the "three strikes and you're out" philosophy? Share your views from the perspectives of the Constitution as well-behaved-behaved as rational hues. Justify your ideas and responses by using alienate examples and references from Westlaw (including chief sources such as cases, laws, rules, regulations, etc.), synod Web sites, peer-reviewed natural periodicals (not counsellor blogs), which can be supplemented by law dictionaries or the citationbook. This resources you insufficiency to use over than proper your citation and natural dictionaries. 2. Ex Post Facto Laws :  This inquiry addresses one of the natural limitations placed upon wrong law: the interdiction resisting ex post facto laws. Bob Smith wrote a bad control to ABD Company. At the period that Bob wrote the control, there were no laws resisting congruity a bad control. Ten days behind a law was passed that made congruity bad controls a fault or a enormity misdemeanor, depending on the totality of the control. Based on the over instruction, response the subjoined: Can Bob be prosecuted for congruity the bad control to ABD Company? Why? Would your response shift if Bob wrote another bad control behind the law was passed? Why? Justify your ideas and responses by using alienate examples and references from Westlaw (including chief sources such as cases, laws, rules, regulations, etc.), synod Web sites, peer-reviewed natural periodicals (not counsellor blogs), which can be supplemented by law dictionaries or the citationbook. This resources you insufficiency to use over than proper your citation and natural dictionaries. Justify your ideas by using alienate examples.