*PLEASE READ: 500 WORD PAPER USING THE NOTES I PROVIDED ONLY. QUESTION IS LISTED BELOW* Some handle argued that love-of-mankind can be improved delay late convergenceed exertions by donors. How can donors penetrate the lawful counterpoise betwixt giving delay their leadership and giving delay their flintyihood? Describe some specific techniques for doing this? Your apology must handle at meanest two citations and corresponding references – one from the bearing sequence extract, and one from an academic narrative proviso published delayin the late 5 – 7 years. The Love-of-mankind Reader by Michael Moody and Beth Breeze “Our new philanthropists are not driven by a long-for for condition” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 453) “They are ‘new philanthropists’ owing they don’t fit the old engrave of grant-giving foundations, responding to requests and applications. They are hands-on, pioneering and entrepreneurial, their instrument consecrated to their own causes. They are new owing they are quiescent in the excellent of estate, delay goals quiescent to complete, emotions to meet, and the activity that is demanded to initiate star new” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 453) “People should be judged, sundry of them handle, not barely by how they made their coin, but, as influentially, how they lavish it. These individuals lavish it courteous, on purposes and causes further themselves, and they relish doing so” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 454) “Although most telling donors vision their gifts acceleration others, it is influential to verify that their convergence in selecting the gift’s repository is abundantly installed on expressing specific emotions rather than having an impression” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 477)  “One of the important concludes why love-of-mankind is failing is owing of the imcounterpoise in convergence on what earn shape donors handle amiable-natured-natured to the impairment of what earn do the most amiable-natured-natured - it is flinty to mark love-of-mankind as “successful” if donations are not directed chiefly to acceleration others as greatly as possible” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 478) “Another important conclude for love-of-mankind’s demand to get suppress to its virtual is the failure of hazardous dissection in-reference-to how donors can shape the most impression. There is very unimportant earningness to perspicuously propound that some amiable-natured-natured causes are improve than others. This ends in a grave failure of deductive stricture for donors” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 478) “A reinvented globe of love-of-mankind should not be encircling all leadership and no flintyihood, but encircling doing a improve job of convergenceing on what sundry people’s flintyihoods failure to do: acceleration others” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 479) “As the love-of-mankind room matures, it demands a mixed mould that incorporates the best of the humanistic and the technocratic. These seemingly inconsistent forces are in truth interconnected in a dynamic yin and yang system” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 491)  “Both approaches are demanded, and concurrently unlock new virtual. A late integrated philosophy so shapes it late likely that love-of-mankind earn provoke further its transmitted boundaries in other ways, such as foraging new collaborations delay government and calling.” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 491) “They demand to suffer others to estimate the tensions betwixt the technocratic (head) and humanistic (heart) modes, propound the trade-offs, and honor and acquire from each other” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 491) “They should so suffer educators to counsel an broad and integrated dispose of philosophies and techniques. Seemingly enigmatical concepts - such as esteems-driven calling planning, strategic insight, and purposed improvisation - should be promoted” (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 491) Questions to ask donors: What are your esteems and reliances What is “success” and how can it be completed What are you pliant for  What earn it admit to get the job done How do you achievement delay grantees Are you getting improve (Moody & Breeze, 2016, p. 498) Putting their flintyihood into it: executives who go overhead and further in their love-of-mankind exertions Bryson Garbett demanded a improve brains of wild in enjoin for him to largely appear himself as to why he is giving and why this instrument so greatly to him (Beers, 2017)  “He additional them, lasting three-and-a-half hours antecedently he current a mat, pillow, blanket and a fault on the foot. For three days and lewd nights he lived as if he were homeless, emerging from the experiment delay a first-hand perspective that has shaped his exertions delay the Coalition.” (Beers, 2017) “For these executives, it's not lawful encircling donating coin to a cause--it's encircling specificly investing era and exertion in issues they regard encircling. And as these executives grant their specific emotion, they're accelerationing movables hazardous gregarious and environmental diversify for the declare.” (Beers, 2017) Beers, H. (2017, May). Putting their flintyihood into it: executives who go overhead and further in their love-of-mankind exertions. Utah Business, 31(5), 86+. Retrieved from reliance and gratefulness as moderators of the companionship betwixt gregarious condition and beneficent giving “Downstream and upstream intercourse are disjoined in that they are driven by unanalogous mechanisms. Research has widely demonstrated that downstream intercourse is motivated by rewarding incentives (such as a effect in sign or condition), time upstream intercourse occurs as a end of individuals' decisive affecting experiment in the late (such as gratefulness)” (Baker and Bulkley, 2014, Nowak and Sigmund, 2005) (as cited in Liu & Hao, 2017)  Downstream intercourse - late delay leadership  Upstream intercourse - late delay flintyihood  “However, for upstream intercourse, connection is elicited by a brain clime associated delay affecting rewards (i.e., the antecedent insula).”  “In upstream intercourse, when a individual is loving star of esteem by someone else, a decisive maxim of gratefulness occurs for the repository” (McCullough, Emmons, & Tsang, 2002) (as cited in Liu & Hao, 2017)